It is about
3 years since I wrote 'The secret of the elements' and a year since it was published
with Armida Publications. The question I am regularly asked by fans and friends
is why I wrote the book. Apart from the obvious reason, because the book answers
that question, I guess people want to know what mind-frame instigated the story,
what was the spark of inspiration.
It begins
with Mikhail Bakunin “if god exists I am legal opposition.” And “Satan is the emancipator of man” It
begins with Rimbaud’s Satan is light and God is darkness.
And me
thinking Satan is complimentary of God and to use one to oppose the other may
shock and help to prove a point but cancels the argument out completely.
It begins
with me smoking a cigarette outside a student house at the University of Surrey
thinking “is it possible for a mortal to trick Satan on a soul sale.” It begins
with my optimism for the future of mankind agreeing with Isaac Asimov that one
day we will colonize our galaxy and disagreeing that Earth will be a myth for
that mankind.
But that is
not all.
I grew up
in superstition, in stories from the elder women in my mother’s village about
ghosts and demons. I grew up with myths and religion. Then I discovered
mathematics and nanotechnology. I discovered poetry and philosophy, scientific
method and the arts and then it was light.
I read a
great deal of books where human life is a tragedy and I tend to agree that yes
life is a tragedy. Happiness is rare, optimism is wishful thinking and our death
is certain. In orthodox Christianity Judaism is much stronger than Catholicism.
Life on earth is a painful path, obedience to the dogma and God’s will, shall
bring relief, eternal life and peace and happiness after death. Any deviation
from it will lock the “soul” into earth, in purgatory, in hell.
Aristotle
claimed that man has two natures of god and animal, of instinct and logic. I
found that the religious dogma call for the suppression of instincts through illogical
and irrational practices. It is impossible to escape your nature, and by
refusing it or abstaining from it religion manages to fabricate an army of
hypocrites with no escape from hell. Religionistas terrorize society with
images of monsters that rape and kill the innocent. But that is part of human
nature. Atheists will terrorize society with religious monsters that rape and
kill those who do not believe. It is reasonable then to believe that there is
no future for mankind. That mankind is a parasite driving other life forms to extinction
and pretty much does the same to less dominant cultures.
This planet
is destined to become a desert, a red dessert painted in blood.
What is
also part of human nature is teamwork. Humans help each other instinctively,
they recognize that in order to survive and adapt to their environment they
require the help of others. Intelligence and rational thinking are the evolution
tools of humanity.
When I was
studying at University of Hull there was a rumor going on about the new Vice
Chancellor. According to the libel in his thesis there was a claim that
technology was society’s doom. I never read the thesis but many of the
technology orientated staff used it to explain university’s decision not to
co-fund their scientific projects. I do remember though our literature teacher
in high-school telling us that we do not need any more technology, that we can
stop producing more technology and freeze progress to live a life concentrated
more on the arts. I also remember reading in Richard Feynman the argument he
had with an artist that a scientist cannot see the poetic beauty of plant for
example. Richard claimed that a scientist can see the building elements of the plant,
the mechanisms in its chemistry, its atomic structure and there is beauty there
in abundance.
I had
enough of arguments between the arts and sciences, about poetic beauty in
elements, enough of people arguing about politics, art,
science and religion. I found them to be dogmatic. Dogma’s are congregative and
promote segregation.
I isolated
myself and dreamed of a world in a transition between death and biological or
scientific immortality. In a world with no death, humanity evolves somewhat
differently. I dreamed of a place where there are no questions unanswered. I
dreamed of a world where the only missing element in construction is conquered.
A world were time becomes a building block. I dreamed of an academic world
where ideas come together to compliment one another, where music is the bridge
between science and arts. I dreamed of one phantasmagoric human culture, of one
language, of a unique organism. Then I wrote ‘The secret of the elements’. In
the book an avant-garde composer Bartholomew Marshal has to negotiate with the
devil that was tricked by his grand mother Basilica Marshal. He asked for the ‘Secret
of the elements’ in exchange of her soul. Barto’s mind aged one million years
in a week. He envisioned many parallel versions of the future of mankind; he
managed to see the beginning, the end and the rebirth of the cosmos within the
short time frame of one million years (of on week or one nanosecond). In this
book Satan and God are competitors and both heads of large corporations
fighting so hard for control in a soon to be obsolete market.
In this
book I made man both immortal and a god, then god and its cronies seized to
exist.
Our human
nature, the one I love so very much, comes forward in Basilica Marshal’s life,
the epicenter of the book, the little village girl with a refreshing view on
life. Basilica is the mother of three kids that met no father and grandmother
of a very special boy. The story is told by a bipolar scientist friend of
Barto, who fights his own demons daily. I wanted to write a story that respects
our need for life and our need of a guardian in control of the unexpected. It
is not an atheist manifesto. Maybe it is the opposite, maybe it is a theist
manifesto with humanity as the new god. It is all written with a touch of humor
in English by a non native speaker. European English, with odd phrases directly
translated from a mind thinking in English and Greek.